the inquiry

How can you be yourself in a world where people don’t know who they are? For this, (i) believe Noxidization is the act of bringing something into being. That is, from Zemajination, (i) am the epitome of this; My Atoms Naturally inspire. Whatever, whoever, and wherever (i) am, (i) feel my purpose is to continue to inspire. And so, to create a world in which we can all aspire to be, then seeking truth and experiencing love go hand in hand. This trilogy deals with a tripartite of truth, love, and being. As the great Hip Hop professor KRS-One said one time, there is a G.U.N. (God, Universe, and Nature) holstered in the culture. Our history isn’t academic; it’s spiritual. it’s vocative. it’s not scripted; it’s momentous. Our history is musical, as it encapsulates the feeling(s) and recollection beyond the mental cage of our bodily autonomy. To choose not from the freedom of our own limitations, but instead, choose to have a deeper understanding of oneself. Not just for yourself, but for the greatest possible outcome; an altruistic approach. Sensibly, the question is not whether you know yourself; it is whether you are yourself. Then it becomes a steeply meditative question. Even a series of meditative questions. This interrogation has been ongoing since the past (the end) to the present (the middle), and it is self-perpetuating as time goes on (the beginning). Who are you? Who am (i)? What are we doing here? Countless accounts, from science to religion, have pondered on these questions and whether there is any innate essence of principle formation. Unless there’s been a revelation (i) am unaware of, we must be ambitious, as we likely need more time to figure it all out. Until then, (i) would like to make a proclamation of my own passion. That is, (i) believe who we are is a manifestation of what we become. Simply put, it’s an entity with many a form. The perplexity develops when we ask, then, in what form of this manifestation of a person do we become? If we can become ourselves, surely we can become another person. it’s not far reaching to suggest that you are a manifestation of what you become. it’s not difficult to notice that when you rely on any other form of inquiry, there is a goal set out in the form of hypotheses; you carry them out by empirical investigation. Observations and critical analysis conjugate our reasoning and understanding, respectively. For what we believe to be true is not a matter of fact at all. We know this, through ancient antiquity, all the way up until now with feminist theories. For what we believe to be true cannot be a matter of fact, since it is not guaranteed a result which is not unceasing. This is not as easily put, to say that it’s impossible for anything to be impossible. However, is it possible for one to determine, by fact, that they exist beyond themselves? Perhaps not. it is interesting to conceive of such a scenario, where (i) can reach beyond my own measures and exist beyond myself, or at least, exist beyond the person (i) was. Surely, (i) would then become a version of myself that is naturally aligned with my personal identity. if not, then it is also interesting to consider a case in which (i) have yet to become naturally aligned with my own identity. A tampering in the mainframe of my bodily autonomy, or perhaps a tampering in the beliefs that make up my identity; to have it hindered, in reality from, becoming what is merely a potential of my own actuality. As a principle, this would be sufficient to prohibit the existence of a limitless being. Thus, without manifestation, we are pawn-like. Our sense of self is not logical, since it does not make sense to anyone but ourselves. it’s nonsensical, for anybody to know anyone other than their own self. Who’s to say it’s not emotional, when it’s the sense in which we express ourselves to the world. Hence the importance of emotional intelligence. Where there’s no sense of self, there’s a deficiency of intelligence. – January 8th, 2025, at 7:20pm; edited April 3rd, 2025, at 12:49pm.